What Does A Failed NST Look Like?

When a nonstress test (NST) fails, it typically means that the results are nonreactive. In simpler terms, a failed NST occurs when accelerations in the fetal heart rate either do not occur or are insufficient. During a normal NST, the fetus’s heart rate should increase with movement, indicating a healthy and active baby. However, in cases of a failed NST, the fetal heart rate does not exhibit the desired accelerations, leading to concerns about the baby’s well-being.

One of the key indicators of a failed NST is when the fetal heart rate remains nonreactive throughout the testing period. This means that there is no evidence of appropriate accelerations in response to fetal movement. The absence of these accelerations can signal possible issues with the baby’s oxygen supply or overall health, prompting further evaluation and monitoring to ensure the baby’s safety.

During a failed NST, healthcare providers may observe a lack of variability in the fetal heart rate patterns. Variability refers to the fluctuations in the heart rate, which are essential indicators of the baby’s nervous system development and overall health. A decreased or absent variability in the fetal heart rate can be a red flag during an NST, suggesting the need for additional assessments and interventions.

In some cases, a failed NST may also be characterized by repetitive late decelerations in the fetal heart rate. Late decelerations occur when the fetal heart rate drops after the peak of a contraction, indicating potential issues with the baby’s oxygenation. These decelerations can be concerning during an NST as they may point to fetal distress or compromise, requiring immediate medical attention and intervention.

Another sign of a failed NST is the presence of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, such as bradycardia or tachycardia. Bradycardia refers to a slow heart rate in the fetus, while tachycardia indicates a rapid heart rate. Both of these abnormal patterns can be indicators of underlying fetal distress or complications, necessitating prompt evaluation and management by healthcare professionals.

When evaluating the results of an NST, healthcare providers also take into account the overall quality of the fetal heart rate tracings. A failed NST may exhibit poor signal quality or artifacts that make it challenging to accurately interpret the data. In such cases, repeating the NST or conducting additional tests may be necessary to obtain clearer and more reliable information about the baby’s well-being.

It is important to note that a failed NST does not always indicate a serious problem with the baby. In some instances, factors such as fetal sleep cycles, maternal medications, or maternal obesity can influence the results of the test, leading to false-positive outcomes. Therefore, healthcare providers may recommend further assessments or monitoring to rule out any potential issues and ensure the baby’s health and safety.

Despite the potential implications of a failed NST, it is essential for expectant mothers to remain calm and trust in the expertise of their healthcare team. If a nonstress test yields concerning results, healthcare providers will work swiftly to assess the situation, determine the underlying cause of the abnormalities, and recommend appropriate interventions or treatment options to safeguard the well-being of both the mother and the baby.

In conclusion, a failed NST can manifest in various ways, including nonreactive fetal heart rate, decreased variability, late decelerations, abnormal heart rate patterns, and poor signal quality. These indicators signal the need for further evaluation and monitoring to ensure the baby’s health and safety. By promptly addressing any concerns raised by a failed NST, healthcare providers can take proactive measures to protect the well-being of both the mother and the baby throughout the pregnancy and delivery process.

What Does A Failed NST Look Like?

Photo of author

Nancy Sherman

Nancy Sherman has more than a decade of experience in education and is passionate about helping schools, teachers, and students succeed. She began her career as a Teaching Fellow in NY where she worked with educators to develop their instructional practice. Since then she held diverse roles in the field including Educational Researcher, Academic Director for a non-profit foundation, Curriculum Expert and Coach, while also serving on boards of directors for multiple organizations. She is trained in Project-Based Learning, Capstone Design (PBL), Competency-Based Evaluation (CBE) and Social Emotional Learning Development (SELD).